Network meta ‐analysis comparing iFR versus FFR versus coronary angiography to drive coronary revascularization

ConclusionCompared to CA alone, both FFR and iFR are safe and effective in guiding coronary revascularization at 12 months. In patients with stable CAD, both FFR and iFR ‐guided revascularization reduce the risk of subsequent MI at 12 months.

Source: Journal of Interventional Cardiology - December 5, 2018 Category: Cardiology Authors: Roberto Verardi, Francesco Fioravanti, Umberto Barbero, Federico Conrotto, Pierluigi Omed è, Antonio Montefusco, Claudio Moretti, Maurizio D'Amico, Mauro Rinaldi, Javier Escaned, Fabrizio D'Ascenzo Tags: ORIGINAL INVESTIGATION Source Type: research