What counts as an “environmental” issue? Differences in issue conceptualization by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status

Publication date: Available online 18 February 2020Source: Journal of Environmental PsychologyAuthor(s): Hwanseok Song, Neil A. Lewis, Matthew T. Ballew, Mario Bravo, Julie Davydova, H. Oliver Gao, Robert Garcia, Sofia Hiltner, Sarah M. Naiman, Adam R. Pearson, Rainer Romero-Canyas, Jonathon P. SchuldtAbstractRacial/ethnic minorities and lower-socioeconomic (SES) groups in the U.S. face disproportionate environmental risks, which may hold implications for how these groups construe environmental issues, relative to other segments of the public. We explored this possibility with a diverse sample of 1191 U.S. adults, hypothesizing that, relative to White and higher-SES respondents, non-White and lower-SES respondents would rate a greater number of pressing societal issues as also “environmental.” Across 18 issues, ranging from ecological issues more traditionally the focus of environmental advocacy and scholarship (e.g., pollution; eco-oriented issues) to issues that also constitute human social determinants and consequences of environmental risk (e.g., poverty; human-oriented issues), non-White and lower-income respondents rated human-oriented issues as more “environmental.” Environmental justice perceptions partially mediated group differences in issue conceptualization. Results hold implications for the measurement of environmental attitudes and efforts to broaden public engagement within racially and economically diverse communities.
Source: Journal of Environmental Psychology - Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Source Type: research