EMMS drag model for simulating a gas–solid fluidized bed of geldart B particles: Effect of bed model parameters and polydisperity

Publication date: Available online 26 December 2019Source: ParticuologyAuthor(s): Krishnadash S. Kshetrimayum, Seongho Park, Chonghun Han, Chul-Jin LeeAbstractThe energy minimization multi-scale (EMMS) is a heterogeneous drag model widely used to simulate gas–solid fluidized beds. In this work, we conducted computational fluid dynamics simulations of a gas–solid fluidized bed for Geldart B particles to compare the EMMS with the homogeneous Gidaspow drag model. The results from both the homogeneous and heterogeneous drag models were compared with literature experimental data on pressure drop and bed expansion. There was no noticeable difference in predicted bed characteristics in the slugging regime. However, in the turbulent regime, the EMMS model predicted slightly lower bed expansion than did the Gidaspow model. We evaluated the effects of solid–solid and solid–wall interaction parameters by varying the restitution and specularity coefficients. Bed expansion increases by a factor of 1.05–1.08 when the restitution coefficient increases from 0.9 to 0.99. The models predict a higher solid volume fraction and higher solid downflow velocity near the wall for a low specularity coefficient of 0.01 or 0. When we considered solid phases of different sizes to model polydisperity, the simulation predicted vertical segregation of 300, 350, and 400 μm in the fluidized region due to gravity. Furthermore, the drag models made similar predictions in bad characteristics from...

Source: Particuology - December 26, 2019 Category: Science Source Type: research