Are human remains inappropriate for younger audiences?

A few days ago I received a notice from Youtube about one of our videos. Apparently someone had marked it “inappropriate” and following review by Youtube staff the video was age-restricted. The video in question is part of a series called “Favourite Things“, in which museum staffers select one of their favourite museum objects and describes it and why it is so special. In this particular video, Collections Manager Ion Meyer, is showing and describing three preparations of a so-called ischiopagus. That is, twins conjoined at the pelvis. Since the video was published in March 2011 it has had almost 220,000 views. In comparison, the second-most watched video in our Youtube-channel has had less than 10,000 views. The ischiopagus video has also triggered more comments than is usual for our videos. We have tried to respond to all serious comments, but we also chosen not to respond to some, e.g. Why would any parent let someone do this to their children! They need a proper burial! Bless there souls! <3 If you look at the Youtube guidelines, reasons for placing an age-restriction on a video include Sexually suggestive content Partial nudity or non-sexual nudity Actual violence or very graphic fictional violence Gory, disturbing imagery in an appropriate context However, they also highlight notable exceptions for some educational, artistic, documentary and scientific content (e.g. health education, documenting human rights issues, etc.), but only if this i...
Source: Biomedicine on Display - Category: Medical Scientists Authors: Tags: human remains video youtube @en Source Type: blogs