Creativity under workload pressure and integrative complexity: The double-edged sword of paradoxical leadership

Publication date: Available online 30 January 2019Source: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision ProcessesAuthor(s): Yan Shao, Bernard A. Nijstad, Susanne TäuberAbstractModern-day organizations often demand creativity, but motivating creativity under unfavorable conditions such as high workload pressure is difficult. Integrating paradox theory and social cognitive theory, we conceptualize creativity as a process that involves tensions among competing goals and demands, and those tensions become salient under high workload pressure. We propose that learning to constructively deal with such salient tensions is important for the development of creativity and that paradoxical leader behavior (PLB) may stimulate creativity by enhancing employees’ creative self-efficacy (CSE) in such challenging situations. However, PLB will only promote CSE and employee creativity when employees have a high level of integrative complexity to accept and appreciate the complex and paradoxical behaviors of the leader. Based on data from 252 employee-supervisor dyads, we found that through CSE, PLB was most effective in promoting employee creativity when workload pressure and integrative complexity were both high. However, PLB was less effective for promoting CSE and creativity when workload pressure was low, or when workload pressure was high while integrative complexity was low. Implications and limitations of our research are discussed.

Source: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes - January 30, 2019 Category: Psychiatry & Psychology Source Type: research