Rejoinder to “Patient preferences for the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation”

We read with interest the recent article “Patient preferences for the delivery of cardiac rehabilitation” [1], which aimed to assess cardiac rehabilitation (CR) programme design preferences among a cohort who received treatment for coronary heart disease. This is important research as persistent sub-optimal utilisation continues to lim it the individual, clinical, and economic impacts of traditional centre-based CR. Indeed, centre-based CR uptake and completion rates in Queensland, Australia—where this research was conducted—have been reported to be as low as 13.66% and 9.70%, respectively [2].
Source: Patient Education and Counseling - Category: International Medicine & Public Health Authors: Tags: Correspondence Source Type: research