The prevalence and outcomes of transradial percutaneous coronary intervention for acute coronary syndrome. Analysis from the single-centre ISACS-TC Registry (International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Transitional Countries) (2010-12)

The aims were to compare the prevalence and short-term outcomes of transradial (TRA) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in dedicated radial centre. This was a single-centre observational study of 3484 consecutively enrolled patients with ACS in a 3-year period (2010–12). There were 1648 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 1836 with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTEACS). All patients underwent diagnostic coronary angiography within 24 h (STEMI) or within 72 h (NSTEACS). Percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in 84.9% patients (96.6% with STEMI and 74.9% with NSTEACS). Optimal medical treatment (OMT) only was recommended to 2.2% with STEMI and to 11.1% with NSTEACS. Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery was performed for 1.7% of STEMI and 14.1% of patients with NSTEACS (P < 0.0001). Most of the PCI procedures were performed through the wrist access (radial 97% and ulnar artery access 1.3%). There was high overall procedural success 98.5% (STEMI 99% and NSTEACS 97%). At 30 days, cardiovascular mortality was 4.7% in STEMI patients and 1.4% in patients with NSTEACS who were treated by PCI (P < 0.0001). Major adverse cardiac events defined as a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and non-CABG major bleeding and major access site complications at 30 days were higher in STEMI vs. NSTEACS patients (7.7 vs. 4.4%; P < 0.0001). Transradial access for PCI in a large cohort of unselected...
Source: European Journal of Heart Failure Supplements - Category: Cardiology Authors: Tags: Articles Source Type: research