Editorial Comment

The clinical significance of radiation exposure from imaging remains an area of debate and the authors provide a fresh perspective. Currently we know that radiation effects are cumulative in nature and yet no dose limit exists related to medical imaging and limited data reflect actual patient radiation exposure from imaging.1 The current study contextualizes these uncertain harms in the backdrop of CTU.
Source: The Journal of Urology - Category: Urology & Nephrology Authors: Tags: Adult Urology Source Type: research