Sealing or infiltrating proximal carious lesions

Conclusions Sealing or infiltration are likely to be more efficacious for arresting early (non-cavitated) proximal lesions than NI. Clinical significance Practitioners should strive to perform micro-invasive treatment instead of NI for early proximal lesions. The decision between sealing or infiltration should be guided by practical concerns beyond efficacy.
Source: Journal of Dentistry - Category: Dentistry Source Type: research