From Intuitive to Evidence Based: Developing the Science of Nature as a Public Health Resource
PDF Version (1.1 MB)
About This Article
Published: 6 November 2017
Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact ehponline@niehs.nih.gov. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.
Related EHP Article
Nature Contact and Human Health: A Research Agenda
Howard Frumkin, Gregory N. Bratman, Sara Jo Breslow, Bobby Cochran, Peter H. Kahn Jr, Joshua J. Lawler, Phillip S. Levin, Pooja S. Tandon, Usha Varanasi, Kathleen L. Wolf, and Spencer A. Wood
Doctors nationwide have already begun giving their patients “park prescriptions,” instructions to improve their health by spending more time outdoors.1,2,3 A growing body of evidence suggests that nature, whether the green leaves of a city park or the natural sounds of a back-country wilderness, may help us think better, feel better, and possibly even live longer.4,5,6 But as the authors of a new commentary in Environmental Health Perspectives posit, before nature can truly be tapped as a public health resource, many critical research questions remain to be answered.7
“The notion that nature contact is good for people is very intuitive,” says ...
Source: EHP Research - Category: Environmental Health Authors: Daniil Lyalko Tags: Science Selection Source Type: research
More News: Australia Health | Biology | Children | Diabetes | Diabetes Type 2 | Disability | Endocrinology | Environmental Health | Epidemiology | International Medicine & Public Health | Legislation | Men | Occupational Health | Partnerships | Pediatrics | Politics | Psychology | Science | Study | University of Washington | USA Health | Women | Yale