The updated grading system of prostate carcinoma: an inter ‐observer agreement study among general pathologists in an academic practice

In 2016, the grading criteria for Gleason scoring (GS) have been updated in the WHO classification of tumors of the prostate, and a new set of grade groups (GG) was introduced. As the inter‐observer discordance is a well‐known concern in Gleason grading before the update and no reproducibility study testing the grade groups exists, we planned to evaluate the inter‐observer agreement of the most updated grading system. Four pathologists assessed 126 cores of prostatic carcinoma, and Kappa (k) test was calculated. The agreements for both GS and GG were substantial (k = 0.753 and 0.752; respectively). Discerning GG 2 from 3 also attained reasonable outcome (k = 0.675). Based on our results, the updated grading system seems to be reproducible, with satisfactory inter‐observer concordance rate.

Source: APMIS - September 15, 2017 Category: Research Authors: Areej M. Al Nemer, Tarek Elsharkawy, Mohamed Elshawarby, Dalal Al ‐Tamimi, Haitham Kussaibi, Ayesha Ahmed Tags: Original Article Source Type: research