A systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: Evaluating effects on development of critical thinking skills
The advantages of using traditional closed-book examinations are closely compared to the advantages of using open-book examinations for the development of critical thinking skills in nursing students. The use of critical thinking skills is vital among nurses to assess patient needs and modify standard approaches to individualize care for better patient outcomes. The following areas are compared and contrasted for both closed-book and open-book examinations: examination preparation, rote memorization versus active learning, intellectual engagement, simulation of working environment, higher order thinking skills, anxiety reduction and student satisfaction.
Source: Nurse Education in Practice - Category: Nursing Authors: Beth Johanns, Amber Dinkens, Jill Moore Tags: Review Source Type: research
More News: Anxiety | Education | Environmental Health | Learning | Nurses | Nursing | Students | Universities & Medical Training