Advancing Alternative Analysis: Integration of Decision Science

Conclusions:
We advance four recommendations: a) engaging the systematic development and evaluation of decision approaches and tools; b) using case studies to advance the integration of decision analysis into alternatives analysis; c) supporting transdisciplinary research; and d) supporting education and outreach efforts. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP483

Received: 16 December 2015
Revised: 09 May 2016
Accepted: 19 September 2016
Published: 13 June 2017
Address correspondence to T. F. Malloy, UCLA School of Law, Box 951476, 3113 Law Building, Los Angeles, CA, 90095-1476. Telephone: [phone]. E-mail:[e-mail]
Supplemental Material is available online https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP483.
The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Note to readers with disabilities: EHP strives to ensure that all journal content is accessible to all readers. However, some figures and Supplemental Material published in EHP articles may not conform to 508 standards due to the complexity of the information being presented. If you need assistance accessing journal content, please contact [e-mail]. Our staff will work with you to assess and meet your accessibility needs within 3 working days.

Supplemental Material PDF (914 KB)

Note to readers with disabilities: EHP has provided a 508-conformant table of contents summarizing the Supplemental Material for this article (see below) so readers with disabilities may determine ...

Source: EHP Research - June 14, 2017 Category: Environmental Health Authors: Karla Gonzalez Tags: Review Source Type: research