MIT News: " Closing the ‘free will’ loophole "

< div class= " separator " style= " clear: both; text-align: center; " > < a href= " http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WTpWAlFcb0I/UweQZ0J4GkI/AAAAAAAAAcY/qeeQLTJPRZU/s1600/confused-baby.jpg " imageanchor= " 1 " style= " clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em; " > < img border= " 0 " src= " http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-WTpWAlFcb0I/UweQZ0J4GkI/AAAAAAAAAcY/qeeQLTJPRZU/s1600/confused-baby.jpg " height= " 320 " width= " 264 " / > < /a > < /div > I can ' t decide whether I am confused, was confused, or will have going to have been confused by < a href= " http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2014/closing-the-free-will-loophole-0220.html " > this article < /a > . Or, indeed, whether my anticipation of said confusion may have in some manner adversely impacted the quantum probability of my being confused in the future having read this article, or whether I will subsist in simultaneous states of both confusion and non-confusion at the same time and point in space, regardless. < br / > < br / > Or not.

Source: Across the Bilayer - February 22, 2014 Category: Research Source Type: blogs